Biological & biotechnology R&D × data science

Turning complex science into clear decisions.

Bring me in when an analysis is stalled, an experiment needs an independent review, or complex results must become a clear manuscript, figure set, or R&D decision. I combine experimental biology, genomics, statistics, reproducible R/Python, and fit-for-purpose machine learning.

15+years in scientific research
Co-inventorpublished international patent application
Based in Aargau, SwitzerlandSwiss, Chilean, & American citizen
Scienceto signal

Between the datasets

Connecting the evidence behind the decision.

Most R&D teams have more data than time. Analyses get postponed, designs get locked in under deadline, and experiments can end up addressing something slightly different from what originally mattered.

The evidence behind an important decision rarely lives in one dataset. Sequencing data may sit with one team, phenotyping or imaging with another, and molecular assays, analytical measurements, or process data somewhere else again.

My approach is simple: start with the biological question, make uncertainty visible, and build only the analysis the decision requires.

Across Puregene AG, the Salk Institute, and Yale University, I have worked at the intersection of genome editing, genomics, molecular biology, imaging, statistics, and machine learning—from applied R&D to fundamental questions involving DNA replication and chromatin.

Bridging those gaps is the work.

Public examples use only open, synthetic, or independently created materials. No confidential or proprietary information is included.

When to bring me in

Concrete problems. Focused support.

01

Data without a clear conclusion

The data exist, but the analysis or biological interpretation is stalled.

02

Before an expensive experiment

The design, controls, endpoints, or analysis plan need an independent review.

03

Results need a scientific story

A manuscript, report, or figure set needs a clearer evidence-based narrative.

04

Evidence is split across teams

Genomics, phenotyping, imaging, and molecular results do not yet support one decision.

Consulting process

Clear scope. Useful handoff.

01

Initial conversation

Clarify the scientific question, priorities, and desired outcome.

02

Defined scope

Agree on deliverables, timing, and boundaries.

03

Focused work

Complete the analysis, review, figures, writing, or experimental guidance.

04

Useful handoff

Deliver documented results, reusable files, and clear next steps.

Research & scientific impact

Discovery translated into methods, models, and IP.

A scientific track record spanning genome editing, plant developmental biology, deep-learning phenotyping, and translational research.

01Patent application

Increasing periderm in plant roots

Co-inventor on a published international patent application covering compositions and genome-editing methods designed to increase root periderm and suberin.

Published international patent application · WO2023164515A2 · 2023
View application
02First-author transcriptomics paper

SHATTERPROOF2 cell-type transcriptomics

Connected experimental design, floral synchronization, an SHP2-specific reporter, FACS, wet-lab biology, RNA-seq, bioinformatics, interpretation, and scientific writing to resolve a reproductive meristem at cell-type resolution.

Plant Physiology · 2016 · DOI 10.1104/pp.15.01845
Read open-access paper
03Genome editing

From gene target to crop phenotype

Hands-on genome-editing expertise across Arabidopsis and crop systems — including cannabis and Solanaceae — connecting CRISPR strategy, molecular validation, phenotyping, genomics, and reproducible analysis.

CRISPR/Cas · Molecular validation · Crop R&D
My research has been published in
Plant PhysiologyFirst-author research
ScienceChromatin & DNA repair
The Plant CellGenome stability
Nature PlantsSolanaceae genomics
DevelopmentPlant reproduction
Frontiers in Plant ScienceSeed transcriptomics
PLOS ONERNA-seq & salt stress
Plant PhenomicsDeep-learning phenotyping

Selected work

Rigorous methods. Clear decisions.

Independent examples demonstrating how I approach uncertainty, validation, reproducible analysis, and scientific communication.

01

Machine learning · synthetic data

Machine learning for biological phenotyping

Problem

Biological classifiers can look accurate while failing on new experimental groups.

Approach

Built a confidentiality-safe workflow with group-aware validation, calibration, model comparison, and interpretable features.

Pythonscikit-learnGroupKFoldROC-AUCCalibration

Result

A reproducible demonstration that exposes leakage and quantifies predictive uncertainty.

Decision

Whether a model is reliable enough to guide further biological validation.

02

Healthcare operations · data analysis

Data science for hospital operations

Problem

Delays between discharge orders and departures are important but easy to describe without testing.

Approach

Defined measurable intervals, compared groups statistically, and built decision-focused visualisations.

Rdplyrggplot2Hypothesis testingOperational analytics

Result

A reproducible, patient-data-free case study separating patterns from unsupported assumptions.

Decision

Where operational review or targeted data collection should begin.

03

First-author research · Plant Physiology

SHATTERPROOF2 cell-type transcriptomics

Problem

The identity of a small reproductive domain was obscured by mixed tissue and processing effects.

Approach

Combined floral synchronization, an SHP2-specific reporter, FACS, RNA-seq, and stringent filtering.

RedgeRDESeq2CufflinksFACSRNA-seq

Result

Identified 363 differentially expressed genes and evidence of a meristematic identity.

Decision

Which candidate regulators warranted functional follow-up.

04

ML phenotyping · GWAS-ready

PAT: from stained roots to quantitative traits

Problem

Manual periderm measurements limited experimental scale and reproducibility.

Approach

Combined staining, automated microscopy, and UNet++ segmentation across 20 natural accessions.

PythonUNet++ResNetSemantic segmentationMicroscopyGWAS-ready traits

Result

Automated measurements reached 94% efficiency relative to expert measurements.

Decision

Enabled scalable traits for genome-wide association mapping and mutant screening.

How I can help

Scientific depth. Analytical discipline. Useful outcomes.

01

Experimental strategy, before you run

Review the design, sampling, controls, endpoints, and analysis plan before valuable samples or resources are committed.

Explore serviceClose details
  • Review plant studies, screens, field trials, panel studies, molecular experiments, and other high-value experimental runs.
  • Translate the biological question into measurable endpoints, replication, controls, quality checks, and a defensible statistical plan.
  • Identify risks early and provide concise recommendations that can be incorporated before the work begins.
02

Analysis when the data is already there

Turn an existing biological dataset into a documented analysis, reproducible code, clear figures, and conclusions your team can use.

Explore serviceClose details
  • Assess the dataset, metadata, structure, and analytical question to define a focused route through the work.
  • Clean, integrate, model, visualize, and document the data using transparent R or Python workflows.
  • Deliver reusable code, publication-ready figures, and an uncertainty-aware account of what the evidence does and does not support.
03

Genomics, phenotyping & predictive modelling

Build fit-for-purpose analytical and predictive workflows for genomics, imaging, phenotyping, sensory, and other biological data.

Explore serviceClose details
  • Work across RNA-seq, molecular assays, image analysis, longitudinal experiments, repeated measures, and multivariate datasets.
  • Develop predictive workflows with feature engineering, group-aware validation, appropriate metrics, and interpretable model comparisons.
  • Connect biological context to reproducible delivery through R/Python, quality control, testing, and clear documentation.
04

Molecular biology & experimental troubleshooting

Independent scientific feedback for refining, troubleshooting, and interpreting molecular-biology experiments and workflows.

Explore serviceClose details
  • Review RNA extraction, PCR and qPCR, Western blotting, cloning, CRISPR workflows, genotyping, and molecular validation strategies.
  • Connect protocol choices, controls, sample quality, and downstream analysis to the biological question.
  • Support experimental interpretation and next-step planning across plant molecular biology, genomics, genome editing, and phenotyping.
Experimental designData cleaning & QCMixed-effects modelsMachine learningScientific RAGFigures & reporting

Research background

Built in the lab.
Refined in the data.

My perspective comes from working across discovery science, genomics, bioengineering, and commercial R&D. I understand the experimental context behind the dataset — and the decisions waiting on the other side.

2025 — 2026

Puregene AG

Senior Scientist / Data Scientist

Cannabis genome-editing platform · applied crop R&D · quantitative analysis · genomics

2016 — 2018

Yale University

Postdoctoral Researcher

Genome stability · epigenetics · histone modification · CRISPR/Cas9 · DNA replication

Research group · Jacob Lab

Project enquiries

Have a dataset or scientific bottleneck?

Send a short description of the question, dataset, or project stage. I'll reply with whether I can help and what a focused first step could look like.